In an interview with journalist Ricardo Baldasar from the Folha de Sவ்o Paulo newspaper, which was augmented by other media, Yale University law and political science professor said: ‘It always seemed to me that Lula’s case did not fit the system exactly. (Operation) In the most complex cases of Lava Jato.
He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture and that his confession had been obtained through torture, and that his confession had been obtained through torture.
According to the eminent expert, “It would be a shame to use all the wrongdoings committed in Lula’s case (former Judge Sergio Moro) to disqualify.”
In 2019, Ross-Ackerman signed a letter with international law colleagues in which he was shocked by the revelation of messages exchanged between Moro and Lava Jato lawyers, and condemned part of the former magistrate’s actions.
“A lot of things happened at the trial, Moro was the judge of the cases (corruption in Petropras), but Lula’s case was different, it was not part of the whole set,” he explained.
So I think the result is right now, but there is definitely a time issue, he said.
He noted that the 2018 sentence “prevented Lula from being a candidate and allowed the promotion of (Jair) Bolsanaro”.
I do not know what people think now, but there is a problem in making this decision now, many years after the election, he noted.
The Supreme Court last week confirmed that the case would resume on June 23 on suspicion of Moro’s discrimination in proceedings against the former labor leader.
The full session of the High Court has already formed a majority to confirm the decision of the second courtroom, which declared Moro to suspect Lula of arbitrarily attempting the case in what is known as the Guarrero triplex case.
However, the votes of Minister Marco Aurelio Mello (who asked for more time to investigate the case) and SDF leader Luis Fox were missing.
The issue’s end has the recaptured Lula in the spotlight on May 26.
After the SDF confirmed in April that Moro had acted in a discriminatory manner in judicial cases, the former union leader’s lawyers called the ruling a “victory of the law” and the restoration of proper legal procedures and “credibility of judicial power” in Brazil. “
ga / ocs